65433 2011-07-31 12:57:39 -0700 REGRESSION (r91777): fast/css/font-family-pictograph.html failing on SnowLeopard Intel Release (Tests) 2011-07-31 17:16:58 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit Tools / Tests 528+ (Nightly build) Mac OS X 10.6 RESOLVED FIXED http://build.webkit.org/results/SnowLeopard%20Intel%20Release%20(Tests)/r91799%20(31748)/results.html LayoutTestFailure, MakingBotsRed, Regression P2 Normal --- 1 rniwa webkit-unassigned andersca aroben mitz oldest_to_newest 444433 0 rniwa 2011-07-31 12:57:39 -0700 fast/css/font-family-pictograph.html started failing on SnowLeopard Intel Release (Tests) between r91771 and r91799 (inclusive). http://trac.webkit.org/log/trunk?rev=91799&stop_rev=91771 http://build.webkit.org/results/SnowLeopard%20Intel%20Release%20(Tests)/r91770%20(31747)/results.html passed http://build.webkit.org/results/SnowLeopard%20Intel%20Release%20(Tests)/r91799%20(31748)/results.html failed 444445 1 mitz 2011-07-31 13:30:03 -0700 (In reply to comment #0) > fast/css/font-family-pictograph.html started failing on SnowLeopard Intel Release (Tests) between r91771 and r91799 (inclusive). > > http://trac.webkit.org/log/trunk?rev=91799&stop_rev=91771 The test was introduced in r91777, so it did not “start failing”. It just needs expected results for Snow Leopard and earlier. > > http://build.webkit.org/results/SnowLeopard%20Intel%20Release%20(Tests)/r91770%20(31747)/results.html passed These are results for r91770, when the test did not exist. It did not pass. 444446 2 mitz 2011-07-31 13:33:19 -0700 Expected results added in <http://trac.webkit.org/r92086>. 444475 3 rniwa 2011-07-31 17:15:58 -0700 (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > fast/css/font-family-pictograph.html started failing on SnowLeopard Intel Release (Tests) between r91771 and r91799 (inclusive). > > > > http://trac.webkit.org/log/trunk?rev=91799&stop_rev=91771 > > The test was introduced in r91777, so it did not “start failing”. It just needs expected results for Snow Leopard and earlier. Right. I used TestFailures tool to auto-generate this bug. Maybe TestFailures can be smart and detect newly added tests? Thanks for the quick fix anyway. And I'll really appreciate if you could take a look at https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439 as well. 444476 4 rniwa 2011-07-31 17:16:58 -0700 (In reply to comment #3) > > Right. I used TestFailures tool to auto-generate this bug. Maybe TestFailures can be smart and detect newly added tests? Thanks for the quick fix anyway. Already filed https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61645