62010 2011-06-03 06:41:01 -0700 Implement the DOMCrypt API 2021-09-11 10:58:31 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit WebCore JavaScript 528+ (Nightly build) All All RESOLVED INVALID P5 Enhancement --- 0 jarred jarred abarth ap ariya.hidayat ddahl donggwan.kim ehsan gavin.sharp jshin kennyluck mehmetgelisin mihnea mike rsleevi sam syoichi wade.colson oldest_to_newest 414843 0 jarred 2011-06-03 06:41:01 -0700 Master bug for implementing the DOMCrypt API proposal in WebKit Mailing List threads: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-security/2011Jun/0000.html http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-May/031741.html Spec: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Privacy/Features/DOMCryptAPISpec/Latest Mozilla Implementation: https://github.com/daviddahl/domcrypt http://mozilla.ddahl.com/domcrypt/demos/demo.html https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649154 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657432 414956 1 ddahl 2011-06-03 09:38:07 -0700 Currently, the spec is a bit rough and in flux, but I am working to update it as more feedback and criticism comes in. Also, I need to use WebIDL or something like that to make types crystal clear. 414957 2 ddahl 2011-06-03 09:39:07 -0700 A summary of the discussion is being built here: http://etherpad.mozilla.com:9000/DOMCrypt-discussion 415131 3 abarth 2011-06-03 13:28:13 -0700 I might as well own this bug for now. Folk should feel free to steal it from me if they want. 415173 4 ddahl 2011-06-03 14:04:36 -0700 (In reply to comment #3) > I might as well own this bug for now. Folk should feel free to steal it from me if they want. Don't hesitate to ping me on mozilla irc, as 'ddahl'. I am working the WebIDL version of the spec right now and aggregating more feedback. 415789 5 jarred 2011-06-06 05:30:20 -0700 I'll be doing some experimental implementation of this starting late next week; especially since the key exchange bits are going to be a sibling spec later on (wise move IMHO). Assuming the WebIDL will be in the spec by then, I can verify it's not missing anything obvious (e.g. as of now the createHash method is missing its plain text argument, which I know isn't really the case but just an omission in the spec draft). 415829 6 ddahl 2011-06-06 07:30:24 -0700 (In reply to comment #5) > I'll be doing some experimental implementation of this starting late next week; especially since the key exchange bits are going to be a sibling spec later on (wise move IMHO). Assuming the WebIDL will be in the spec by then, I can verify it's not missing anything obvious (e.g. as of now the createHash method is missing its plain text argument, which I know isn't really the case but just an omission in the spec draft). I have started making a WebIDL document for the spec here: https://bug649154.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=537428 This is the spec as the implementation stands right now - which is incorrect based on the feedback in the mailing lists. I am working on a new rev today that updates it for what we actually need. 1000932 7 wade.colson 2014-04-15 13:02:39 -0700 *** Bug 260998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Seen from the domain http://volichat.com Page where seen: http://volichat.com/random-chat-rooms Marked for reference. Resolved as fixed @bugzilla. 1000939 8 ap 2014-04-15 13:14:32 -0700 DOMCrypt evolved into WebCrypto, which we already implement.