<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>57579</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-03-31 14:22:18 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>webkit-patch is too strict about bug URL formatting</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2011-04-04 11:35:31 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>Tools / Tests</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>OS X 10.5</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Adam Roben (:aroben)">aroben</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Adam Roben (:aroben)">aroben</assigned_to>
          <cc>abarth</cc>
    
    <cc>bweinstein</cc>
    
    <cc>darin</cc>
    
    <cc>eric</cc>
    
    <cc>ojan</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>377443</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Adam Roben (:aroben)">aroben</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-31 14:22:18 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>webkit-patch is too strict about bug URL formatting</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>377445</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
      <attachid>87786</attachid>
    <who name="Adam Roben (:aroben)">aroben</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-31 14:23:27 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 87786
Patch</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>377446</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
      <attachid>87786</attachid>
    <who name="Adam Barth">abarth</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-31 14:25:05 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 87786
Patch

We changed this recently because other folks were sad that we were being too loose.  We should be sure we&apos;re making progress here instead of just flip/flopping between what two different camps want.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>377448</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Adam Barth">abarth</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-31 14:25:35 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56989 is the earlier bug.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>377451</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Adam Roben (:aroben)">aroben</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-31 14:26:07 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>See my comments in bug 56989 for why I think this is justified.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>377455</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Adam Barth">abarth</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-31 14:30:13 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>I don&apos;t have strong feelings about this topic.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>377474</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
      <attachid>87786</attachid>
    <who name="Darin Adler">darin</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-31 15:06:13 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 87786
Patch

Seems fine.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>377508</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Ojan Vafai">ojan</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-31 15:50:15 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;m not totally opposed to this change, but I don&apos;t really see the benefit in supporting different changelog formats. IMO, it helps the project if we&apos;re all consistent in how we write changelogs.

Some pros of consistency:
-easier to scan changelog entries quickly
-easier to write tooling for dealing with changelog descriptions
-easier for people new to the project to understand them and understand how to write their own descriptions</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>377511</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Adam Roben (:aroben)">aroben</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-31 15:55:07 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>I agree consistency is a good thing. I feel a little guilty every time I write a non-standard ChangeLog. I was just surprised that the tools started encouraging the format so strongly. And, as stated in bug 56989 comment 15, it seems like a bug that webkit-patch can no longer figure out a bug number for r81850.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>377530</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Ojan Vafai">ojan</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-31 16:18:26 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #8)
&gt; And, as stated in bug 56989 comment 15, it seems like a bug that webkit-patch can no longer figure out a bug number for r81850.

I guess this is the bit I don&apos;t agree with. The bug is only used to update/close the bug. But the patch wasn&apos;t actually fixing the bug. The bug is relevant to understanding the patch, but webkit-patch shouldn&apos;t be updating the bug.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>377540</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="Adam Roben (:aroben)">aroben</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-31 16:31:33 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #9)
&gt; (In reply to comment #8)
&gt; &gt; And, as stated in bug 56989 comment 15, it seems like a bug that webkit-patch can no longer figure out a bug number for r81850.
&gt; 
&gt; I guess this is the bit I don&apos;t agree with. The bug is only used to update/close the bug. But the patch wasn&apos;t actually fixing the bug. The bug is relevant to understanding the patch, but webkit-patch shouldn&apos;t be updating the bug.

In that case --no-close seems appropriate. It would still be helpful to have webkit-patch add a comment to the bug even if you aren&apos;t closing it.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>377791</commentid>
    <comment_count>11</comment_count>
    <who name="Adam Roben (:aroben)">aroben</who>
    <bug_when>2011-04-01 08:12:42 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Given that Darin and Eric seem to agree this patch is an improvement (see Eric&apos;s comment in bug 56989 comment 16) and that other people are running into trouble because of this (c.f. bug 57605), I&apos;m going to land this patch. We can keep discussing further, but it seems good to make stylebot etc. stop complaining about ChangeLog formats that have long been in use (and worked just fine until this week).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>377792</commentid>
    <comment_count>12</comment_count>
    <who name="Adam Roben (:aroben)">aroben</who>
    <bug_when>2011-04-01 08:13:55 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Committed r82681: &lt;http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/82681&gt;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>378297</commentid>
    <comment_count>13</comment_count>
    <who name="Ojan Vafai">ojan</who>
    <bug_when>2011-04-01 19:36:08 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #11)
&gt; Given that Darin and Eric seem to agree this patch is an improvement (see Eric&apos;s comment in bug 56989 comment 16) and that other people are running into trouble because of this (c.f. bug 57605), I&apos;m going to land this patch. We can keep discussing further, but it seems good to make stylebot etc. stop complaining about ChangeLog formats that have long been in use (and worked just fine until this week).

Sorry, I though the patch had already been committed. I was just trying to understand what makes sense going forward.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>378916</commentid>
    <comment_count>14</comment_count>
    <who name="Adam Roben (:aroben)">aroben</who>
    <bug_when>2011-04-04 11:35:31 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Don&apos;t worry, I didn&apos;t think you were trying to hold things up. :-) And I&apos;m glad you want to improve the tools, too.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>87786</attachid>
            <date>2011-03-31 14:23:27 -0700</date>
            <delta_ts>2011-03-31 15:06:12 -0700</delta_ts>
            <desc>Patch</desc>
            <filename>bug-57579-20110331172322.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>3553</size>
            <attacher name="Adam Roben (:aroben)">aroben</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">U3VidmVyc2lvbiBSZXZpc2lvbjogODI2MTUKZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL1Rvb2xzL0NoYW5nZUxvZyBi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</data>
<flag name="review"
          id="80238"
          type_id="1"
          status="+"
          setter="darin"
    />
          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>