5381 2005-10-14 03:07:23 -0700 Support E4X 2013-09-25 08:29:52 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit JavaScriptCore 420+ Mac OS X 10.4 RESOLVED WONTFIX http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-357.htm P3 Enhancement --- 1 arthur_webkit webkit-unassigned alex andersca bird0fprey cmarcelo electricnet emacemac7 fclee ian marcus mike mrowe robin webmaster wiredearp xanthor+bz zoshe oldest_to_newest 22065 0 arthur_webkit 2005-10-14 03:07:23 -0700 JavaScriptCore should support E4X. 32394 1 joost 2006-02-13 16:04:50 -0800 Reassigning to webkit-unassigned, to make sure more people see this. 32755 2 joost 2006-02-15 13:44:01 -0800 Sounds like a valid request. 64828 3 fclee 2007-12-20 09:38:07 -0800 I'm an OS X developer hired to add OS X support to a MS product, here in Silicon Valley, CA. XML is the data vector between the two worlds. I *NEED* E4X support in Safari. Firefox appears to be the ONLY browser that supports E4X: var e = <employees> <employee id="1"><name>Joe</name><age>20</age></employee> <employee id="2"><name>Sue</name><age>30</age></employee> </employees>; var names = e..name; // get all the names in e Safari can't handle the above code. Firefox/Mozilla can. Apple claims Safari is the *best* browser. WHERE'S E4X????? Ric. fclee@mimosasystems.com 64840 4 mrowe 2007-12-20 10:56:31 -0800 Please leave the rhetoric out of comments in Bugzilla. It detracts from the technical nature of the content. 159305 5 bird0fprey 2009-10-30 06:37:57 -0700 Can someone outline a reason why this isn't a major priority? e4x is the best thing to happen to JavaScript, especially server-side implementations, what are the politics behind it not being included? I guess I am trying to understand both, is it still not on the roadmap, and why not. Thank you for your time, Marcel 175877 6 robin 2009-12-30 04:46:05 -0800 Is there no way to vote on bugs? Why is support for the latest ECMAScript standard not higher priority - why has this still not been assigned to anyone? 188487 7 mrowe 2010-02-06 19:44:28 -0800 *** Bug 34678 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 193229 8 zoshe 2010-02-23 20:46:52 -0800 I to would like to vote for webkit to have e4x. It would be so much fun having it. 306153 9 alex 2010-11-08 09:14:22 -0800 Just for reference, this is ECMA Standard 357, ECMAScript for XML (E4X) Specification, 2nd Edition (December 2005) http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-357.htm 933018 10 andersca 2013-09-25 08:29:52 -0700 E4X has been removed from Firefox so I don't see the point in us supporting it, let's close this bug.