50279 2010-11-30 15:17:14 -0800 Allow transition-delay to affect non-animatable properties 2011-08-01 20:48:00 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit CSS 528+ (Nightly build) PC OS X 10.5 NEW P2 Normal --- 1 simon.fraser webkit-unassigned cmarrin dino simon.fraser oldest_to_newest 315346 0 simon.fraser 2010-11-30 15:17:14 -0800 It has been suggested that non-animatable properties should respect transition-delay, to allow the author to control when they change. 315744 1 cmarrin 2010-12-01 11:00:33 -0800 So, if you want an image to change after a period of time the logical thing to do would be to go: transition-property: background-image; transition-delay: 2s But this won't work since you need a transition-duration. Seems like the better model would be to use a step function and set the transition up like any other property. Then all non-animatable properties would always use a step timing-function, either implicit or explicit. Then you'd set it up like this: transition-property: background-image; transition-duration: 2s; transition-timing-function: step-end; (I don't remember the step function syntax, but you get the idea). I think this makes more sense and I think it would be easier to integrate this with other transitions. 315746 2 cmarrin 2010-12-01 11:01:20 -0800 So maybe a better title for this bug is "Allow non-animatable properties to animate with step timing-function"? 315788 3 simon.fraser 2010-12-01 11:59:41 -0800 Or we still respect the delay even if the duration is zero? 445093 4 dino 2011-08-01 20:48:00 -0700 *** Bug 65488 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***