46590 2010-09-26 16:25:47 -0700 [Meta] Make CSS in WebKit more awesome 2013-10-03 11:59:39 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit CSS 528+ (Nightly build) All All RESOLVED INVALID P2 Enhancement --- 46593 12519 16020 16662 42764 46591 46592 46594 46595 49142 52040 52162 103597 1 dglazkov webkit-unassigned arv cmarcelo dominicc donggwan.kim fsamuel hyatt igor.oliveira morrita ojan peter phiw2 rafael.lobo sam simon.fraser skyul syoichi webmaster oldest_to_newest 285195 0 dglazkov 2010-09-26 16:25:47 -0700 This is a meta bug to track all enhancements to CSS and related plumbing. 285252 1 simon.fraser 2010-09-26 19:47:22 -0700 What's the point of this bug? 285259 2 dglazkov 2010-09-26 20:04:35 -0700 (In reply to comment #1) > What's the point of this bug? Purely organizational -- it's a nice treetop: https://bugs.webkit.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=46590&hide_resolved=0 285775 3 sam 2010-09-27 14:59:27 -0700 I am not sure I understand how all those bugs are related. Can we give this a more descriptive title? There are lots of efforts to make CSS more awesome (hyatt's recent pagination work, dan's recent hyphenation work, hyatt's current block-flow work), should they all be under this umbrella bug? 285823 4 dglazkov 2010-09-27 15:47:41 -0700 (In reply to comment #3) > I am not sure I understand how all those bugs are related. Can we give this a more descriptive title? There are lots of efforts to make CSS more awesome (hyatt's recent pagination work, dan's recent hyphenation work, hyatt's current block-flow work), should they all be under this umbrella bug? Yes, they totally should! I thought about using keywords at first, but they are a bit awkward and don't show a nice hierarchy of depending bugs. I don't mind giving this a better title. 935902 5 ap 2013-10-03 11:59:39 -0700 I agree with Sam, it's unclear why we have this dormant meta bug.