43357 2010-08-02 09:24:01 -0700 Web Inspector: Split inspector.idl into a number of interfaces, one per domain. 2011-02-08 11:08:53 -0800 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit Web Inspector (Deprecated) 528+ (Nightly build) All All RESOLVED WONTFIX P2 Normal --- 0 pfeldman webkit-unassigned bweinstein joepeck keishi loislo pfeldman pmuellr rik timothy yurys oldest_to_newest 258922 0 pfeldman 2010-08-02 09:24:01 -0700 There should be several APIs, one for each domain (DOM, Debugging, Network, Storage, etc.) in the remote debugging protocol. 259614 1 pmuellr 2010-08-03 12:17:15 -0700 +1 on splitting the APIs on a not-quite-related tangent, the FireBug folks are also working on a Remote Debug API, but haven't gotten much further than "Scripts" and "Console" -level APIs. See: http://getfirebug.com/wiki/index.php/Crossfire_Protocol_Reference CrossFire is also currently only spec'd in HTML. If there were ever any interest in "standardizing" these sorts of APIs, doing it in WebIDL makes the most sense (to me, today). Basically, I think Web Inspector is a bit ahead of FireBug here. Is there any desire to pull in the FireBug guys to standardize on these APIs? 347542 2 pfeldman 2011-02-08 11:08:53 -0800 Am aggressively triaging the bugs. Not sure we need this one filed. Sounds like inspector.idl serves us fine for now. We'll split it later under some refactoring bugs.