40543 2010-06-13 02:29:01 -0700 return QWebElement& from QWebElement::setAttribute() 2010-06-16 02:12:31 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit WebKit Qt 528+ (Nightly build) All All RESOLVED WONTFIX Qt P2 Enhancement --- 0 pd webkit-unassigned kent.hansen tonikitoo vestbo oldest_to_newest 237530 0 pd 2010-06-13 02:29:01 -0700 How about returning QWebElement& from QWebElement::setAttribute() to make chaining possible? I guess other methods of QWebElement could take advantage from this change as well. 238472 1 kent.hansen 2010-06-15 11:07:45 -0700 Changing the return type is not binary compatible (see http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Examples#Change_the_return_type). It could be done for Qt 5, though. Tor Arne, what do you think? Was this considered in the API reviews? 238624 2 tonikitoo 2010-06-15 17:17:38 -0700 maybe RESOLVED - LATER instead of INVALID, so we can revisit it at some point? 238746 3 vestbo 2010-06-16 02:12:21 -0700 Chaining was not considered a goal for this API, as in most cases a normal semi-colon and multiple statements does the same job and is more in line with Qt's existing APIs. foo.setAttribute("foo", "bar"); foo.setAttribute("biz", "baz");