35637 2010-03-03 03:21:09 -0800 [Qt] qwebplugindatabase.h included in <QtWebKit> on static builds 2010-03-10 04:25:41 -0800 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit New Bugs 528+ (Nightly build) Other OS X 10.5 RESOLVED WONTFIX Qt P2 Normal --- 1 vestbo webkit-unassigned robert oldest_to_newest 195433 0 vestbo 2010-03-03 03:21:09 -0800 This bug report originated from issue QTBUG-7339 http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-7339 --- Description --- I built Qt 4.6 statically on a Ubuntu 9.10 box using the following flags: <div class="code panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="codeContent panelContent"> <pre class="code-java">/path/to/src/configure -prefix /usr/local/Trolltech/Qt-4.6.0-<span class="code-keyword">static</span> -release -opensource -<span class="code-keyword">static</span> -fast -qt-sql-sqlite -no-qt3support -nomake <span class="code-quote">"demos examples"</span> -silent -platform linux-g++-32</pre> </div></div> <p>Which builds just fine. When I try to compile one of my applications (which have a <tt>QT += webkit</tt> line), I get the following error:</p> <p><tt>/usr/local/Trolltech/Qt-4.6.0-static/include/QtWebKit/QtWebKit:15:32: error: qwebplugindatabase.h: No such file or directory</tt></p> <p>After some exploring I found out that the above file includes <tt>qwebplugindatabase.h</tt> even on static builds. Since plugins are not supported on static builds, this line shouldn't be there.</p> <p><b>Workaround:</b><br/> A quick workaround is to use more granular includes, like <tt>#include &lt;QtWebKit/QWebFrame&gt;</tt> instead of <tt>#include &lt;QtWebKit&gt;</tt>.</p> 197751 1 robert 2010-03-09 13:36:10 -0800 This seems like another Qt specific (as opposed to QtWebKit specific) build problem. 197955 2 vestbo 2010-03-10 03:07:56 -0800 We now to the module header and class headers as part of the WebKit/qt/Api derived sources, so the fix for this should be made in trunk. 197980 3 vestbo 2010-03-10 04:24:21 -0800 The QtWebKit module header should include all header files, and the headers should be usable regardless of the build configuration. Is this an issue in trunk still? 197982 4 vestbo 2010-03-10 04:25:41 -0800 Actually we don't really support static builds, so closing this for now, unless the original reporter (not me) reopens it with a valid test-case for trunk.