<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>31495</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2009-11-13 14:52:45 -0800</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>LayoutTests/storage/hash-change-with-xhr.html does not need the call to dumpDatabaseCallbacks()</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2009-11-13 15:24:22 -0800</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>New Bugs</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P3</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Dumitru Daniliuc">dumi</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Dumitru Daniliuc">dumi</assigned_to>
          <cc>dglazkov</cc>
    
    <cc>michaeln</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>163538</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Dumitru Daniliuc">dumi</who>
    <bug_when>2009-11-13 14:52:45 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>LayoutTests/storage/hash-charge-with-xhr.html has an unnecessary call to dumpDatabaseCallbacks(). We should remove it.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>163539</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
      <attachid>43206</attachid>
    <who name="Dumitru Daniliuc">dumi</who>
    <bug_when>2009-11-13 14:53:59 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 43206
patch</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>163542</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Dimitri Glazkov (Google)">dglazkov</who>
    <bug_when>2009-11-13 14:58:30 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Will this affect test results?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>163543</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
      <attachid>43206</attachid>
    <who name="Eric Seidel (no email)">eric</who>
    <bug_when>2009-11-13 14:59:51 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 43206
patch

OK.  I&apos;m surprised this doesn&apos;t require results updates?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>163545</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Dumitru Daniliuc">dumi</who>
    <bug_when>2009-11-13 15:01:51 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #2)
&gt; Will this affect test results?

It shouldn&apos;t. Ben said that the only reason they had that line there is to check for quota problems. However, there&apos;s no way this test is going to exceed a 5MB quota (they&apos;re only requesting 100K), so Ben agreed that this call is no longer needed.

I ran all storage/ layout tests and they all passed.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>163554</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Dumitru Daniliuc">dumi</who>
    <bug_when>2009-11-13 15:24:22 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Landed as r50969.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>43206</attachid>
            <date>2009-11-13 14:53:59 -0800</date>
            <delta_ts>2009-11-13 14:59:51 -0800</delta_ts>
            <desc>patch</desc>
            <filename>patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>1056</size>
            <attacher name="Dumitru Daniliuc">dumi</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">SW5kZXg6IExheW91dFRlc3RzL0NoYW5nZUxvZwo9PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09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</data>
<flag name="review"
          id="24901"
          type_id="1"
          status="+"
          setter="eric"
    />
    <flag name="commit-queue"
          id="24902"
          type_id="3"
          status="-"
          setter="dumi"
    />
          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>