27998 2009-08-04 14:37:44 -0700 http/tests/cache/subresource-expiration.html uses 4.5 seconds of delay 2010-04-08 02:00:59 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit Tools / Tests 528+ (Nightly build) PC OS X 10.5 NEW P2 Normal --- 27995 1 eric webkit-unassigned abarth darin oldest_to_newest 137131 0 eric 2009-08-04 14:37:44 -0700 http/tests/cache/subresource-expiration.html uses 4.5 seconds of delay These were added in: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/45003 Current runtime of this test is 6.25s on my machine. That's about 1% of total LayoutTest runtime. :( Is the delay really necessary? { testHeaders: { 'Cache-control': 'max-age=1', }, delay: 1.5, expectedResult: 'Uncached', }, { testHeaders: { 'Last-modified': '[now-3600s]', }, delay: 1.5, expectedResult: 'Cached', }, { testHeaders: { 'Last-modified': '[now-10s]', }, delay: 1.5, expectedResult: 'Uncached', }, 137222 1 eric 2009-08-04 18:25:57 -0700 Actually, this is the slowest test in Release mode :( 6.22 secs: http/tests/cache/subresource-expiration.html See list https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=34108 on bug 27995. 139017 2 eric 2009-08-11 10:14:31 -0700 Yup, still the slowest test by over a second. :) https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=34573 207531 3 eric 2010-04-01 17:30:39 -0700 Just timed out on Snow Leopard: http://build.webkit.org/results/SnowLeopard%20Intel%20Release%20(Tests)/r56952%20(7567)/results.html That may not be related to this bug however. 210091 4 abarth 2010-04-08 02:00:59 -0700 Again: http://build.webkit.org/results/SnowLeopard%20Intel%20Release%20(Tests)/r57262%20(7898)/http/tests/cache/subresource-expiration-pretty-diff.html