259038 2023-07-09 16:27:29 -0700 [CSS Math Functions] Fix failures in css/css-values/minmax-percentage-serialize.html 2024-09-18 23:09:01 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit CSS WebKit Nightly Build Unspecified Unspecified RESOLVED DUPLICATE 278244 InRadar P2 Normal --- 1 ntim webkit-unassigned webkit-bug-importer oldest_to_newest 1965856 0 ntim 2023-07-09 16:27:29 -0700 `min(1%, 2%, 3%)` should stay `min(1%, 2%, 3%)` instead of collapsing to `calc(1%)`, given we can't conclude whether 1% is positive or negative. Same for `max(1%, 2%, 3%)`. 1965857 1 webkit-bug-importer 2023-07-09 16:27:38 -0700 <rdar://problem/111986644> 1965858 2 ntim 2023-07-09 16:30:26 -0700 The only exception to this is if there's only one argument (see bug 259037) 1965862 3 ntim 2023-07-09 18:29:22 -0700 So arguably, WebKit's behavior is more correct here, since it does the collapsing only for properties that have a non-negative range. The test should perhaps be adjusted to test for both types of properties. 1965863 4 ntim 2023-07-09 18:36:41 -0700 It does look like the test uses text-indent, which does take a negative range as well, so WebKit isn't working as intended here. 1965867 5 ntim 2023-07-09 19:50:40 -0700 Hmm, this is more about whether a percentage can resolve to a negative value. `text-indent` / `margin-left` percentages are relative to the size of the containing block... 2061359 6 ntim 2024-09-18 23:06:31 -0700 The test now fully passes. Not sure what exactly fixed it though 2061362 7 ntim 2024-09-18 23:09:01 -0700 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 278244 ***