<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>25129</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2009-04-09 22:51:22 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Add support for cache-control: no-cache=&quot;foo&quot;</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2009-06-03 17:11:56 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>Page Loading</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>DUPLICATE</resolution>
          <dup_id>13128</dup_id>
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Darin Fisher (:fishd, Google)">fishd</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Nobody">webkit-unassigned</assigned_to>
          <cc>ap</cc>
    
    <cc>ddkilzer</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>117121</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Darin Fisher (:fishd, Google)">fishd</who>
    <bug_when>2009-04-09 22:51:22 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Add support for cache-control: no-cache=&quot;foo&quot;

From RFC 2616 section 14.9.1:

  If the no-cache directive does specify one or more field-names,
  then a cache MAY use the response to satisfy a subsequent request,
  subject to any other restrictions on caching. However, the
  specified field-name(s) MUST NOT be sent in the response to a
  subsequent request without successful revalidation with the origin
  server. This allows an origin server to prevent the re-use of
  certain header fields in a response, while still allowing caching
  of the rest of the response.

So, it is not correct to treat no-cache=&quot;foo&quot; as equivalent to no-cache.  Doing so means missing out on opportunities to cache content.

See bug 24656 for related discussion.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>124256</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Antti Koivisto">koivisto</who>
    <bug_when>2009-06-03 17:11:56 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>The patch in bug 13128 wil fix this as well.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 13128 ***</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>