<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>238780</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2022-04-04 18:32:25 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Convention to indicate caller is responsible for maintaining external ref</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2022-04-11 18:33:15 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>WebCore Misc.</component>
          <version>WebKit Nightly Build</version>
          <rep_platform>Unspecified</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Unspecified</op_sys>
          <bug_status>NEW</bug_status>
          <resolution></resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>InRadar</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Gabriel Nava Marino">gnavamarino</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Nobody">webkit-unassigned</assigned_to>
          <cc>sam</cc>
    
    <cc>webkit-bug-importer</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1858174</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Gabriel Nava Marino">gnavamarino</who>
    <bug_when>2022-04-04 18:32:25 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>As recommended by Sam in bug 238747 and as this seems to be the preferred pattern to ensure a ref counted object remains for the scope of the call:

&gt; I wonder ifs we should come up with some convention (naming or otherwise) to
&gt; indicate that a caller is responsible for maintaining an external ref. Like,
&gt; Document::close_mayDestroy(), or perhaps even take it a step further and
&gt; require a separate type to call close()?  
&gt; 
&gt; Ref closer = document.closer()
&gt; closer.close()</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1860516</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Radar WebKit Bug Importer">webkit-bug-importer</who>
    <bug_when>2022-04-11 18:33:15 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>&lt;rdar://problem/91601054&gt;</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>