<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>21921</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-10-28 07:18:26 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>MessagePort messages are dispatched to documents that are not fully active</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-10-29 03:45:39 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>WebCore JavaScript</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>Mac</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>OS X 10.5</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Alexey Proskuryakov">ap</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Alexey Proskuryakov">ap</assigned_to>
          <cc>darin</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>96854</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexey Proskuryakov">ap</who>
    <bug_when>2008-10-28 07:18:26 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>We have a test that is supposed to verify that this doesn&apos;t happen, but it is incorrect, as it lets the document be destroyed.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>96856</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
      <attachid>24711</attachid>
    <who name="Alexey Proskuryakov">ap</who>
    <bug_when>2008-10-28 07:25:22 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 24711
proposed fix</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>96884</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
      <attachid>24711</attachid>
    <who name="Darin Adler">darin</who>
    <bug_when>2008-10-28 11:35:27 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 24711
proposed fix

I&apos;m a little worried that this kind of check might be needed in more cases other than just this event listener function. Is there a way to make this change a more natural part of how you get the frame from the window in the first place? What&apos;s a good way to audit the rest of the code to se if we need other changes like this? Is there a way to change the design to fill this &quot;crack in the foundation&quot;?

r=me</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>96897</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexey Proskuryakov">ap</who>
    <bug_when>2008-10-28 12:24:11 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>I think that DOMWindow&apos;s frame pointer should be cleared out when it stops being active, just like it is the case for Document. And going from DOMWindow to Document and back probably shouldn&apos;t involve Frame at all. In this case, this check wouldn&apos;t be necessary.

But I don&apos;t know the reasons for the current design, maybe I&apos;m way off.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>96899</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Darin Adler">darin</who>
    <bug_when>2008-10-28 12:26:36 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #3)
&gt; I think that DOMWindow&apos;s frame pointer should be cleared out when it stops
&gt; being active, just like it is the case for Document. And going from DOMWindow
&gt; to Document and back probably shouldn&apos;t involve Frame at all. In this case,
&gt; this check wouldn&apos;t be necessary.

Maybe we could add a FIXME mentioning this alternate possible design. It seems fine to clear the DOMWindow&apos;s frame pointer; we just need to test to see if there are any code paths that require on it not being cleared.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>96966</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexey Proskuryakov">ap</who>
    <bug_when>2008-10-29 03:45:39 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Committed revision 37971. Added a FIXME.
</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>24711</attachid>
            <date>2008-10-28 07:25:22 -0700</date>
            <delta_ts>2008-10-28 11:35:27 -0700</delta_ts>
            <desc>proposed fix</desc>
            <filename>DispatchToInactiveDocument.txt</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>2793</size>
            <attacher name="Alexey Proskuryakov">ap</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">SW5kZXg6IFdlYkNvcmUvQ2hhbmdlTG9nCj09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09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</data>
<flag name="review"
          id="11296"
          type_id="1"
          status="+"
          setter="darin"
    />
          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>