193491 2019-01-16 06:55:51 -0800 [GTK] fast/flexbox/missing-repaint-when-flext-item-never-had-layout.html fails 2022-01-17 09:52:09 -0800 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit WebKitGTK WebKit Nightly Build Unspecified Unspecified RESOLVED DUPLICATE 235266 P2 Normal --- 1 aboya webkit-unassigned bugs-noreply crzwdjk dpino oldest_to_newest 1495062 0 aboya 2019-01-16 06:55:51 -0800 fast/flexbox/missing-repaint-when-flext-item-never-had-layout.html The test fails in WPE too. --- /home/slave/webkitgtk/gtk-linux-64-debug-tests/build/layout-test-results/fast/flexbox/missing-repaint-when-flext-item-never-had-layout-expected.txt +++ /home/slave/webkitgtk/gtk-linux-64-debug-tests/build/layout-test-results/fast/flexbox/missing-repaint-when-flext-item-never-had-layout-actual.txt @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ PASS if visible (repaint rects - (rect 8 8 200 18) (rect 8 8 200 200) ) 1524311 1 dpino 2019-04-04 10:50:01 -0700 This test was marked as Failure in WPE in https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/r240102/webkit. I think the test was incorrectly marked as Failure in WPE, since the test was passing before r240102 and has continue returning PASS after r240102. ``` r240100 NOERROR r240101 UNKNOWN r240102 PASS (Expected: FAIL) r240103 UNKNOWN [r240104-r240108] PASS (Expected: FAIL) ``` In the case of GTK, the test was failing before r240102, so after that changeset test expectations match actual result. ``` r240055 TEXT (Expected: PASS) [r240056-r240097] UNKNOWN r240098 TEXT (Expected: PASS) [r240099-r240101] UNKNOWN r240102 TEXT (Expected: FAIL) r240103 UNKNOWN [r240104-r240108] TEXT (Expected: FAIL) ``` I removed the test from WPE/TestExpectations in https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/243872/webkit. The bug is still valid for GTK. 1831514 2 crzwdjk 2022-01-17 09:52:09 -0800 This has been fixed by r288070 allowing LFC integration to work with the complex text path. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 235266 ***