<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>187362</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2018-07-05 14:10:27 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[32-bit JSC tests] ASSERTION FAILED: !butterfly-&gt;propertyStorage()[-I - 1].get() under JSC::ObjectInitializationScope::verifyPropertiesAreInitialized</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2018-07-10 13:49:14 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>JavaScriptCore</component>
          <version>Other</version>
          <rep_platform>Unspecified</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Unspecified</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          <see_also>https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186692</see_also>
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>InRadar</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Ryan Haddad">ryanhaddad</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</assigned_to>
          <cc>ap</cc>
    
    <cc>ews-watchlist</cc>
    
    <cc>fpizlo</cc>
    
    <cc>keith_miller</cc>
    
    <cc>mark.lam</cc>
    
    <cc>msaboff</cc>
    
    <cc>realdawei</cc>
    
    <cc>saam</cc>
    
    <cc>tsavell</cc>
    
    <cc>webkit-bug-importer</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1439549</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Ryan Haddad">ryanhaddad</who>
    <bug_when>2018-07-05 14:10:27 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>The following assertion failure is seen with 858 tests on the 32-bit JSC bot:

ASSERTION FAILED: !butterfly-&gt;propertyStorage()[-i - 1].get()
./runtime/ObjectInitializationScope.cpp(89) : void JSC::ObjectInitializationScope::verifyPropertiesAreInitialized(JSC::JSObject *)
1   0x2a104b WTFCrash
2   0x134540e JSC::ObjectInitializationScope::verifyPropertiesAreInitialized(JSC::JSObject*)
3   0x134501a JSC::ObjectInitializationScope::~ObjectInitializationScope()
4   0x1345537 JSC::ObjectInitializationScope::~ObjectInitializationScope()
5   0x9ce262 JSC::createRegExpMatchesArray(JSC::VM&amp;, JSC::JSGlobalObject*, JSC::JSString*, WTF::String const&amp;, JSC::RegExp*, unsigned int, JSC::MatchResult&amp;)
6   0x9cceb4 JSC::RegExpObject::execInline(JSC::ExecState*, JSC::JSGlobalObject*, JSC::JSString*)
7   0x139354e JSC::RegExpObject::exec(JSC::ExecState*, JSC::JSGlobalObject*, JSC::JSString*)
8   0x1395ebb JSC::regExpProtoFuncExec(JSC::ExecState*)
9   0xdbddb0e1
10  0x3a0238 llint_entry
11  0x3a0238 llint_entry
12  0x3a0238 llint_entry
13  0x39a100 vmEntryToJavaScript
14  0xe46c19 JSC::JITCode::execute(JSC::VM*, JSC::ProtoCallFrame*)
15  0xe460b6 JSC::Interpreter::executeProgram(JSC::SourceCode const&amp;, JSC::ExecState*, JSC::JSObject*)
16  0x1159e12 JSC::evaluate(JSC::ExecState*, JSC::SourceCode const&amp;, JSC::JSValue, WTF::NakedPtr&lt;JSC::Exception&gt;&amp;)
17  0x7309f runWithOptions(GlobalObject*, CommandLine&amp;, bool&amp;)
18  0x43d0a jscmain(int, char**)::$_3::operator()(JSC::VM&amp;, GlobalObject*, bool&amp;) const
19  0x290ea int runJSC&lt;jscmain(int, char**)::$_3&gt;(CommandLine, bool, jscmain(int, char**)::$_3 const&amp;)
20  0x27880 jscmain(int, char**)
21  0x277a7 main
22  0xa73f4611 start

https://build.webkit.org/builders/Apple%20High%20Sierra%2032-bit%20JSC%20%28BuildAndTest%29/builds/2238</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1439552</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Ryan Haddad">ryanhaddad</who>
    <bug_when>2018-07-05 14:12:40 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>This assert was added with https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/232951/webkit</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1440714</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexey Proskuryakov">ap</who>
    <bug_when>2018-07-09 20:46:01 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Is this still happening?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1440867</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Ryan Haddad">ryanhaddad</who>
    <bug_when>2018-07-10 09:21:31 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to Alexey Proskuryakov from comment #2)
&gt; Is this still happening?
Yes.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1440873</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Radar WebKit Bug Importer">webkit-bug-importer</who>
    <bug_when>2018-07-10 09:30:16 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>&lt;rdar://problem/42027210&gt;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1440944</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
      <attachid>344717</attachid>
    <who name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</who>
    <bug_when>2018-07-10 13:09:04 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 344717
proposed patch.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1440950</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
      <attachid>344717</attachid>
    <who name="Saam Barati">saam</who>
    <bug_when>2018-07-10 13:29:53 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 344717
proposed patch.

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=344717&amp;action=review

&gt; Source/JavaScriptCore/runtime/ObjectInitializationScope.cpp:91
&gt; +#else
&gt; +        return !value || !JSValue::encode(value);
&gt; +#endif

Why are we even pretending this assertion does anything on 32-bit? Can&apos;t we just always return true, since we don&apos;t have a concurrentJIT/concurrentGC?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1440951</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</who>
    <bug_when>2018-07-10 13:35:13 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to Saam Barati from comment #6)
&gt; Comment on attachment 344717 [details]
&gt; proposed patch.
&gt; 
&gt; View in context:
&gt; https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=344717&amp;action=review
&gt; 
&gt; &gt; Source/JavaScriptCore/runtime/ObjectInitializationScope.cpp:91
&gt; &gt; +#else
&gt; &gt; +        return !value || !JSValue::encode(value);
&gt; &gt; +#endif
&gt; 
&gt; Why are we even pretending this assertion does anything on 32-bit? Can&apos;t we
&gt; just always return true, since we don&apos;t have a concurrentJIT/concurrentGC?

Good point. Let me rework the patch.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1440953</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</who>
    <bug_when>2018-07-10 13:43:06 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to Mark Lam from comment #7)
&gt; (In reply to Saam Barati from comment #6)
&gt; &gt; Comment on attachment 344717 [details]
&gt; &gt; proposed patch.
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; View in context:
&gt; &gt; https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=344717&amp;action=review
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; &gt; Source/JavaScriptCore/runtime/ObjectInitializationScope.cpp:91
&gt; &gt; &gt; +#else
&gt; &gt; &gt; +        return !value || !JSValue::encode(value);
&gt; &gt; &gt; +#endif
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; Why are we even pretending this assertion does anything on 32-bit? Can&apos;t we
&gt; &gt; just always return true, since we don&apos;t have a concurrentJIT/concurrentGC?
&gt; 
&gt; Good point. Let me rework the patch.

On second thought, I&apos;ll leave it as is.  Reasons:
1. This way, this code has parity with the 64-bit version (more or less).
2. While it is true that this assertion is a non-issue on 32-bit because it doesn&apos;t currently support the concurrent GC, I don&apos;t think we need to make it more difficult for anyone to implement / add support for the concurrent GC on 32-bit in the future if they wish.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1440955</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</who>
    <bug_when>2018-07-10 13:49:14 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Thanks for the review.  Landed in r233697: &lt;http://trac.webkit.org/r233697&gt;.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>344717</attachid>
            <date>2018-07-10 13:09:04 -0700</date>
            <delta_ts>2018-07-10 13:29:53 -0700</delta_ts>
            <desc>proposed patch.</desc>
            <filename>bug-187362.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>2176</size>
            <attacher name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">SW5kZXg6IFNvdXJjZS9KYXZhU2NyaXB0Q29yZS9DaGFuZ2VMb2cKPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09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</data>
<flag name="review"
          id="362738"
          type_id="1"
          status="+"
          setter="saam"
    />
          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>