184915 2018-04-24 07:59:16 -0700 Text inside the block part of an IB split isn't affected by parent opacity. 2026-01-24 13:57:38 -0800 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit Layout and Rendering WebKit Nightly Build Unspecified Unspecified RESOLVED CONFIGURATION CHANGED https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234690 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=287407 P2 Normal --- 1 emilio webkit-unassigned ahmad.saleem792 bfulgham simon.fraser zalan oldest_to_newest 1417149 0 338649 emilio 2018-04-24 07:59:16 -0700 Created attachment 338649 testcase.html STR: Load the attached test-case. Expected result: "Block" is grey, since it's inside a parent with opacity: 0.2. Actual result: "Block" is not affected by opacity. I _think_ Firefox and Edge are right on this one, but I'm not confident about how stacking contexts and IB splits interact to be 100% sure. 1417176 1 emilio 2018-04-24 09:43:08 -0700 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011May/0710.html and https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660682 Look relevant here... 1417199 2 emilio 2018-04-24 11:10:45 -0700 So Mats Palmgren pointed out that recently the spec had been clarified around this in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1477#issuecomment-380771705: > In a block-in-inline split, the block is inside the inline in the box tree, and is a sibling of the two fragments of the inline in the fragment tree So it doesn't matter whether the spec refers to box or element tree, opacity should apply to the block. 1942196 3 ahmad.saleem792 2023-03-17 16:50:42 -0700 I am able to reproduce this bug in WebKit ToT as well based of (261811@main), it is still ‘Block’ does not have opacity. 2058414 4 ahmad.saleem792 2024-09-07 17:52:37 -0700 Is it same as? https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-color/inline-opacity-float-child.html?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=safari%3Afail%20chrome%3Apass%20firefox%3Apass 2174643 5 ahmad.saleem792 2026-01-23 16:42:49 -0800 it works fine now in Safari Technology Preview 235. Might have progressed with `blocks-in-inline` work. I am marking this as `Configuration Changed`. @Alan - please correct me, if I am wrong. 2174785 6 zalan 2026-01-24 13:57:38 -0800 yeah this has progressed with block-in-inline work. continuation must have confused some render layer logic. 338649 2018-04-24 07:59:16 -0700 2018-04-24 10:44:43 -0700 testcase.html file_184915.txt text/html 224 emilio PCFET0NUWVBFIGh0bWw+DQo8bWV0YSBjaGFyc2V0PSJVVEYtOCI+DQo8c3R5bGU+DQpzcGFuIHsN CiAgYm9yZGVyLXN0eWxlOiBzb2xpZDsgLyogSnVzdCBzbyB0aGVyZSdzIGFueXRoaW5nIG90aGVy IHRoYW4gdGV4dCB0byByZW5kZXIgKi8NCiAgb3BhY2l0eTogMC4yOw0KfQ0KPC9zdHlsZT4NCjxz cGFuPg0KICBJbmxpbmUNCiAgPGRpdj5CbG9jazwvZGl2Pg0KICBJbmxpbmUNCjwvc3Bhbj4=