<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>167851</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2017-02-04 23:53:08 -0800</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Leaks bot should use WebKit2</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2018-12-06 13:42:14 -0800</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>Tools / Tests</component>
          <version>WebKit Nightly Build</version>
          <rep_platform>Unspecified</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Unspecified</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>DUPLICATE</resolution>
          <dup_id>69543</dup_id>
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Andreas Kling">kling</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Nobody">webkit-unassigned</assigned_to>
          <cc>ap</cc>
    
    <cc>kling</cc>
    
    <cc>lforschler</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1273362</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Andreas Kling">kling</who>
    <bug_when>2017-02-04 23:53:08 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>I think we should switch over the leaks bot to using WebKit2. It&apos;s super red anyway, and any burndown effort would be better spent on WK2 issues than WK1 ones, in my opinion.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1273363</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Andreas Kling">kling</who>
    <bug_when>2017-02-04 23:56:45 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Actually, I&apos;m really lost in how the bots are set up, so I&apos;m unassigning it from myself.

@Alexey: do you agree that we should do this, and if so, do you think it would be easy?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1273375</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexey Proskuryakov">ap</who>
    <bug_when>2017-02-05 08:42:38 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>I agree that testing wk2 would be much better. 

Reconfiguring bots is easy, but first, we need to figure out how to do this in principle. A naive approach would result in only seeing UI process leaks.

Unrelated to this, we should switch the bot to Sierra ASAP. It has a fix for a huge networking leak that adds a lot of noise. I&apos;ll take care of this.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1273376</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Andreas Kling">kling</who>
    <bug_when>2017-02-05 08:46:35 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Absolutely agreed about Sierra.

A slightly less naive approach could simply run &quot;leaks&quot; on each of our processes (WKTR, WebContent, Networking, Databases) and concatenate the results.

I think it would still be useful, and we&apos;d want to see leaks in all processes anyway.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1485800</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexey Proskuryakov">ap</who>
    <bug_when>2018-12-06 13:42:14 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 69543 ***</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>