16152 2007-11-26 18:42:15 -0800 floated box did not shift downward next line when any content in the current line before a floated box has been put into layout flow 2024-03-21 22:43:11 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit CSS 528+ (Nightly build) PC OS X 10.4 RESOLVED CONFIGURATION CHANGED P2 Normal --- 1 johnnyding.webkit webkit-unassigned karlcow oldest_to_newest 62421 0 johnnyding.webkit 2007-11-26 18:42:15 -0800 In IE6/7 & Firefox(both 2.xx & 3.0), when any content in the current line before a floated box is reflowed. The floated box will always be shift downward to next line until either it fits or there are no more floats present. Test with both standard and quirk mode. In Webkit, if sum of both width of content before floated box and width of floated box is fit current line, then both of them will be placed to current line, and the before content will placed on right side of left floated box or left side of right floated box. If not, the floated box will be shift downward to next line like other browser did. The opera has same behavior just like Webkit. After checking CSS V2 specification. (Chapter 9.5, paragraphs 2,3,4), Webkit's behavior is complied with CSS specification, but since Firefox and IE did not follow this rule and some popular Chinese Websites depend IE/Firefox's behavior to design their webpage layout, such as www.dangdang.com(China Amazon) Should WebKit be compatible with FireFox's behavior(will be against CSS Specification) or just follow standard. If you guys decide that WebKit will be compatible with IE/FireFox's behavior. I will send a patch to you guys for review 62423 1 17542 johnnyding.webkit 2007-11-26 18:45:27 -0800 Created attachment 17542 some text follow by floated object The case is for above description! 62425 2 hyatt 2007-11-26 18:54:30 -0800 We have thought about adding a quirk for this, but I am worried that at this point the addition of the quirk would break sites as well. I think this is a WONTFIX, since Firefox and IE are clearly non-compliant with the specification. 62498 3 hyatt 2007-11-27 11:31:15 -0800 Confirming. I think it's worth investigating how major a compatibility issue this is. 62499 4 hyatt 2007-11-27 11:33:46 -0800 One problem here is that both IE and FFX are still non-compliant even in strict mode. This worries me, since it implies that even if we did a quirk it would not be good enough. 2023040 5 karlcow 2024-03-21 22:43:11 -0700 working the same everywhere 17542 2007-11-26 18:45:27 -0800 2007-11-26 18:45:27 -0800 some text follow by floated object test_float_startpos_standard.htm text/html 569 johnnyding.webkit PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUwgUFVCTElDICItLy9XM0MvL0RURCBIVE1MIDQuMDEgRmluYWwvL0VOIj4N CjxodG1sPg0KPGhlYWQ+DQo8bWV0YSBodHRwLWVxdWl2PSJDb250ZW50LVR5cGUiIGNvbnRlbnQ9 InRleHQvaHRtbDsgY2hhcnNldD11dGYtOCIgLz4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5Pg0Kc29tZSB0ZXh0 IGFyZSBmaXJzdCA8aW1nIHNyYz0iIiB3aWR0aD0iMzAwIiBoZWlnaHQ9IjEwMCIgYm9yZGVyPSIx IiBhbGlnbj0ibGVmdCI+IHNvbWUgdGV4dCBhcmUgZm9sbG93aW5nIGZsb2F0IG9iamVjdCBkZXBl bmRlbnQgb24gY3VycmVudCBjb250YWluZXIncyBhdmFsaWFibGUgd2lkdGgNCjxiciBjbGVhcj0i YWxsIj4NCg0Kc29tZSB0ZXh0IGFyZSBmaXJzdCA8aW1nIHNyYz0iIiB3aWR0aD0iMzAwIiBoZWln aHQ9IjEwMCIgYm9yZGVyPSIxIiBzdHlsZT0iZmxvYXQ6cmlnaHQiPiBzb21lIHRleHQgYXJlIGZv bGxvd2luZyBmbG9hdCBvYmplY3QgZGVwZW5kZW50IG9uIGN1cnJlbnQgY29udGFpbmVyJ3MgYXZh bGlhYmxlIHdpZHRoDQo8YnIgY2xlYXI9ImFsbCI+DQoNCjxicj4NCjwvYm9keT4NCjwvaHRtbD4=