146395 2015-06-28 08:29:32 -0700 [ES6] Implement spread for function calls 2016-08-30 11:29:20 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit JavaScriptCore 528+ (Nightly build) Unspecified Unspecified RESOLVED INVALID P2 Normal --- 1 ysuzuki ysuzuki sam oldest_to_newest 1105273 0 ysuzuki 2015-06-28 08:29:32 -0700 Let's do that. 1109153 1 ysuzuki 2015-07-13 11:46:54 -0700 Let's consider several things. 1. currently, var args are specially optimized. this optimization does not work fine for iterators. (since we cannot get length). 2. optimized var args are mainly used in @call. So, my proposal is, 1. the current @call case is transformed into bytecode intrinsic way to keep the current optimization. 2. use var args optimization. so before calling the function, once extract the iterator into the newly allocated array and pass it to var args. 1111489 2 ysuzuki 2015-07-22 17:21:32 -0700 One problem is that, when just using the JS implemented Promise, the class info of the generated Promise becomes the usual JSFinalObject's info. If we would like not to break the current jsDynamicCast<JSPromise*>(promise) and promise.inherits(JSPromise::info()) We need to notify the class info into the ObjectAllocationProfile. And at that time, we need to take care for DFG because DFG assumes that CreateThis results is always JSFinalObject. 1111500 3 ysuzuki 2015-07-22 17:54:39 -0700 (In reply to comment #2) > One problem is that, when just using the JS implemented Promise, the class > info of the generated Promise becomes the usual JSFinalObject's info. > If we would like not to break the current > > jsDynamicCast<JSPromise*>(promise) > > and > > promise.inherits(JSPromise::info()) > > We need to notify the class info into the ObjectAllocationProfile. > And at that time, we need to take care for DFG because DFG assumes that > CreateThis results is always JSFinalObject. oops, I posted it to the wrong issue.