<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>144915</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2015-05-12 10:01:40 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>stress/int8-repeat-out-of-bounds.js and stress/float32-repeat-out-of-bounds.js fail with eager compilation</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2015-05-12 12:27:23 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>JavaScriptCore</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>Unspecified</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Unspecified</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>INVALID</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Minor</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Basile Clement">basile_clement</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Nobody">webkit-unassigned</assigned_to>
          <cc>fpizlo</cc>
    
    <cc>ggaren</cc>
    
    <cc>mark.lam</cc>
    
    <cc>msaboff</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1094185</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Basile Clement">basile_clement</who>
    <bug_when>2015-05-12 10:01:40 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>...</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1094187</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Basile Clement">basile_clement</who>
    <bug_when>2015-05-12 10:04:10 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>After looking at the test, this is probably a minor problem with the test making assumptions on the number of recompilations that is not correct with eager compilation.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1094196</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Filip Pizlo">fpizlo</who>
    <bug_when>2015-05-12 10:38:56 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>It&apos;s intentional. :-). The tests are asserting that we converge quickly and don&apos;t recompile too much. But with eager compilation, we will recompile more because we often don&apos;t get enough profiling in the first round. That&apos;s fine. I don&apos;t think we should try to make these tests pass in eager mode</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1094229</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Basile Clement">basile_clement</who>
    <bug_when>2015-05-12 12:27:01 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #2)
&gt; It&apos;s intentional. :-). The tests are asserting that we converge quickly and
&gt; don&apos;t recompile too much. But with eager compilation, we will recompile more
&gt; because we often don&apos;t get enough profiling in the first round. That&apos;s fine.
&gt; I don&apos;t think we should try to make these tests pass in eager mode

OK, it just seemed weird that we had tests that would only succeed provided some options are within presupposed range, closing this then.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>