14454 2007-06-28 21:52:57 -0700 Truncated values in option pop-ups (used to affect united.com) 2020-10-23 13:32:21 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit Forms 523.x (Safari 3) Mac OS X 10.4 RESOLVED CONFIGURATION CHANGED http://www.united.com/ HasReduction P2 Normal --- 1 gsherloc webkit-unassigned ddkilzer ian jdanni jensimmons kevin mitz sstigler1985 vicki oldest_to_newest 5928 0 gsherloc 2007-06-28 21:52:57 -0700 At united.com the popup menus used to select the dates for a flight (left hand side of the page) have values which appear truncated. Looks fine in Firefox. Tested with r23841. 5943 1 mitz 2007-06-29 01:29:10 -0700 Compared to Firefox, the popups are the same width and the font is the same size, but WebKit leaves less room for the text. 5398 2 ap 2007-07-06 03:53:46 -0700 *** Bug 11204 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 5345 3 gsherloc 2007-07-06 07:22:40 -0700 Added NeedsReduction keyword 64494 4 17957 sstigler1985 2007-12-17 01:34:17 -0800 Created attachment 17957 Reduction without adding any new code Although this reduction is somewhat more true to form in that it stays with the original code of the page, look at reducedmore.html (the next attachment) for a much more succinct reduction; one that doesn't include any Javascript. 64495 5 17958 sstigler1985 2007-12-17 01:35:55 -0800 Created attachment 17958 More succinct (i.e., better) reduction 64497 6 17958 sstigler1985 2007-12-17 01:38:27 -0800 Comment on attachment 17958 More succinct (i.e., better) reduction The issue appears to be that the width of <select> element is manually set too thin in its 'style' attribute. If you remove the 'style' attribute from the <select> elements, they will behave as expected. 64528 7 ddkilzer 2007-12-17 08:10:42 -0800 Thanks for the reduction, Sam! This is clearly an Evangelism issue. Bug 13610 is a similar evangelism issue for Hotwire.com email messages. 64533 8 mitz 2007-12-17 08:17:36 -0800 (In reply to comment #7) > This is clearly an Evangelism issue. As I wrote, > Compared to Firefox, the popups are the same width and the font is the same > size, but WebKit leaves less room for the text. Can we offer the websites in question any solution that will work with both Firefox and Safari? Maybe WebKit's popup button inner metrics should be reconsidered? 64535 9 ddkilzer 2007-12-17 08:35:17 -0800 (In reply to comment #8) > > Compared to Firefox, the popups are the same width and the font is the same > > size, but WebKit leaves less room for the text. > > Can we offer the websites in question any solution that will work with both > Firefox and Safari? Maybe WebKit's popup button inner metrics should be > reconsidered? At what point do we stop trying to fit the text into the element, though? A style of "width: 1px"? If we changed the font metrics (kerning, etc.) to match Firefox, would these pop-up buttons look out-of-place with the rest of the page in Safari? Unless we can make a one-time change to the font metrics, it seems like this would be a slippery slope. Another solution may be to use an ellipsis if we know the text won't fit in the width provided (assuming the ellipsis would fit itself!). Does HTML5 have anything to say about fitting text into a pop-up button when you start changing the width style (on any input element)? 64539 10 mitz 2007-12-17 09:24:07 -0800 Actually, Firefox 3, which uses Aqua buttons, truncates the text just like Safari, so I don't think changes to WebKit should be considered. 180729 11 jdanni 2010-01-14 08:15:50 -0800 It's working fine to me with Chrome 4, webkit 532.5 180730 12 gsherloc 2010-01-14 08:18:59 -0800 Did you look at the reduction? The reduction still shows the problem in Webkit r53178. The united.com site has changed since I reported the bug, so can't be used to demonstrate it anymore. 180733 13 jdanni 2010-01-14 08:26:33 -0800 (In reply to comment #12) > Did you look at the reduction? Sorry, I did not. Anyway, I think this bug should be closed, since the page has changed and evangelism isn't needed anymore. I apologize if I'm wrong. 180929 14 ddkilzer 2010-01-14 14:37:38 -0800 (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Did you look at the reduction? > Sorry, I did not. Anyway, I think this bug should be closed, since the page has > changed and evangelism isn't needed anymore. I apologize if I'm wrong. I think it should be kept open. 17957 2007-12-17 01:34:17 -0800 2007-12-17 01:34:17 -0800 Reduction without adding any new code reducedless.html text/html 1161 sstigler1985 PGh0bWw+Cjxib2R5PgoKPHNjcmlwdCB0eXBlPSJ0ZXh0L2phdmFzY3JpcHQiIHNyYz0iaHR0cDov L2E1Ni5nLmFrYW1haS5uZXQvNy81Ni83MjA3LzljYzdhODBkZjYwZTZlL3d3dy51bml0ZWQuY29t L3VhbC9hc3NldC9mZjI5Y2FsZW5kYXIuanMiPjwvc2NyaXB0PgoKPHNjcmlwdCB0eXBlPSJ0ZXh0 L2phdmFzY3JpcHQiIHNyYz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy51bml0ZWQuY29tL3BhZ2UvZ2VuZXJpY3BhZ2Uv MSwsNTIwMDgsMDAuaHRtbD9Mb2c9MCI+PC9zY3JpcHQ+CgoKPHNlbGVjdCBzdHlsZT0id2lkdGg6 NzRweDsiIG5hbWU9InJldE1vbnRoIiBpZD0ic2hvcF9hcnJpdmVtb250aCI+PC9zZWxlY3Q+Cgo8 c2VsZWN0IHN0eWxlPSJ3aWR0aDo0MHB4OyIgbmFtZT0icmV0RGF5IiBpZD0ic2hvcF9hcnJpdmVk YXkiPjwvc2VsZWN0PgoKPHNjcmlwdCBsYW5ndWFnZT0iSmF2YVNjcmlwdCIgdHlwZT0idGV4dC9q YXZhc2NyaXB0Ij4KCW9DYWxfb2JqLnByb3RvdHlwZS5hTXRoQWJiciA9IFsnSmFuJywnRmViJywn TWFyJywnQXByJywnTWF5JywnSnVuJywnSnVsJywnQXVnJywnU2VwJywnT2N0JywnTm92JywnRGVj J107CglvQ2FsUG9wRCA9IG5ldyBvQ2FsX29iaigib0NhbFBvcEQiLCJkZXBhcnRwb3AiLCJzaG9w X2RlcGFydG1vbnRoIiwic2hvcF9kZXBhcnRkYXkiLGZmMjlUb2RheVllYXJNb250aCxmZjI5VG9k YXlDYWxlbmRhckRheSxmZjI5RGVwWWVhck1vbnRoLGZmMjlEZXBDYWxlbmRhckRheSk7CQkKCW9D YWxQb3BELmJJc1BvcHVwID0gdHJ1ZTsKCW9DYWxQb3BELkluaXQoKTsKPC9zY3JpcHQ+IAoKPHNj cmlwdCBsYW5ndWFnZT0iSmF2YVNjcmlwdCIgdHlwZT0idGV4dC9qYXZhc2NyaXB0Ij4KCW9DYWxQ b3BSID0gbmV3IG9DYWxfb2JqKCJvQ2FsUG9wUiIsInJldHVybnBvcCIsInNob3BfYXJyaXZlbW9u dGgiLCJzaG9wX2Fycml2ZWRheSIsZmYyOVRvZGF5WWVhck1vbnRoLGZmMjlUb2RheUNhbGVuZGFy RGF5LGZmMjlSZXRZZWFyTW9udGgsZmYyOVJldENhbGVuZGFyRGF5KTsJCQoJb0NhbFBvcFIuYklz UG9wdXAgPSB0cnVlOwoJb0NhbFBvcFIuSW5pdCgpOwoJb0NhbFBvcEQub0NhbEZ3ID0gb0NhbFBv cFI7CglvQ2FsUG9wUi5vQ2FsQmsgPSBvQ2FsUG9wRDsKPC9zY3JpcHQ+Cgo8L2JvZHk+CjwvaHRt bD4KCgoKICAgICAgCgkJICAKCgoK 17958 2007-12-17 01:35:55 -0800 2007-12-17 01:35:55 -0800 More succinct (i.e., better) reduction reducedmore.html text/html 243 sstigler1985 PHNlbGVjdCBzdHlsZT0id2lkdGg6NzRweDsiIG5hbWU9InJldE1vbnRoIj48b3B0aW9uPkRlYyAy MDA3PC9vcHRpb24+PG9wdGlvbj5KYW4gMjAwODwvb3B0aW9uPjwvc2VsZWN0Pg0KDQo8c2VsZWN0 IHN0eWxlPSJ3aWR0aDo0MHB4OyIgbmFtZT0icmV0RGF5Ij48b3B0aW9uPjAxPC9vcHRpb24+PG9w dGlvbj4wMjwvb3B0aW9uPjxvcHRpb24+MDM8L29wdGlvbj48L3NlbGVjdD4NCg0KDQoNCiAgICAg IA0KCQkgIA0KDQoNCg0K