<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>129038</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2014-02-19 04:07:53 -0800</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[EFL] Update glib version to the newest in EFL.</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2014-05-27 04:34:14 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>WebKit EFL</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>Unspecified</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Unspecified</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="László Langó">llango.u-szeged</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Nobody">webkit-unassigned</assigned_to>
          <cc>gyuyoung.kim</cc>
    
    <cc>lucas.de.marchi</cc>
    
    <cc>ossy</cc>
    
    <cc>ryuan.choi</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>982316</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="László Langó">llango.u-szeged</who>
    <bug_when>2014-02-19 04:07:53 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Current version is 2.36.0, this is almost one year old. We should update this.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>982318</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
      <attachid>224621</attachid>
    <who name="László Langó">llango.u-szeged</who>
    <bug_when>2014-02-19 04:12:39 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 224621
Patch</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>982327</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
      <attachid>224621</attachid>
    <who name="Gyuyoung Kim">gyuyoung.kim</who>
    <bug_when>2014-02-19 05:23:00 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 224621
Patch

I don&apos;t mind to use the newest glib if there is no issue with EFL libraries. Ryuan, do you know any issue on the latest glib ?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>982334</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Ryuan Choi">ryuan.choi</who>
    <bug_when>2014-02-19 05:57:04 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #2)
&gt; (From update of attachment 224621 [details])
&gt; I don&apos;t mind to use the newest glib if there is no issue with EFL libraries. Ryuan, do you know any issue on the latest glib ?

No, in fact,  I don&apos;t follow it.

Anyway, we&apos;d better to use same version of glib with gtk, my two cents.
GTK port now uses 2.38.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>982704</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Gyuyoung Kim">gyuyoung.kim</who>
    <bug_when>2014-02-19 23:31:16 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #3)
&gt; (In reply to comment #2)
&gt; &gt; (From update of attachment 224621 [details] [details])
&gt; &gt; I don&apos;t mind to use the newest glib if there is no issue with EFL libraries. Ryuan, do you know any issue on the latest glib ?
&gt; 
&gt; No, in fact,  I don&apos;t follow it.
&gt; 
&gt; Anyway, we&apos;d better to use same version of glib with gtk, my two cents.
&gt; GTK port now uses 2.38.

If there is no issue when we run the layout test on EFL and we don&apos;t know any issue about it, can&apos;t we use the latest glib ?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>983192</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="László Langó">llango.u-szeged</who>
    <bug_when>2014-02-21 06:26:05 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #4)
&gt; (In reply to comment #3)
&gt; &gt; (In reply to comment #2)
&gt; &gt; &gt; (From update of attachment 224621 [details] [details] [details])
&gt; &gt; &gt; I don&apos;t mind to use the newest glib if there is no issue with EFL libraries. Ryuan, do you know any issue on the latest glib ?
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; No, in fact,  I don&apos;t follow it.
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; Anyway, we&apos;d better to use same version of glib with gtk, my two cents.
&gt; &gt; GTK port now uses 2.38.
&gt; 
&gt; If there is no issue when we run the layout test on EFL and we don&apos;t know any issue about it, can&apos;t we use the latest glib ?

I cannot check this on my machine, I have a lot of Layout test issues without the patch too. Much more than the bots show. Maybe because I use Ubuntu 12.04, but the bot use 13.04. So my comparison before and after the glib update is irrelevant. :( I have ~3K test failures.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>983549</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
      <attachid>224621</attachid>
    <who name="Gyuyoung Kim">gyuyoung.kim</who>
    <bug_when>2014-02-22 02:08:07 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 224621
Patch

Yes, I ran EFL layout test locally. There are a lot of failing tests on the newest glib. r- because of the fails. We can&apos;t update it until fixing those failings.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1011938</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Csaba Osztrogonác">ossy</who>
    <bug_when>2014-05-27 04:34:14 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Now EFL uses the same glib version (2.38) as GTK: 
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/166403

I don&apos;t think if we want to update 2.39 now.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>224621</attachid>
            <date>2014-02-19 04:12:39 -0800</date>
            <delta_ts>2014-02-22 02:08:06 -0800</delta_ts>
            <desc>Patch</desc>
            <filename>bug-129038-20140219041238.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>1405</size>
            <attacher name="László Langó">llango.u-szeged</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">U3VidmVyc2lvbiBSZXZpc2lvbjogMTY0Mjc1CmRpZmYgLS1naXQgYS9Ub29scy9DaGFuZ2VMb2cg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</data>
<flag name="review"
          id="248709"
          type_id="1"
          status="-"
          setter="gyuyoung.kim"
    />
    <flag name="commit-queue"
          id="248710"
          type_id="3"
          status="-"
          setter="gyuyoung.kim"
    />
          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>