<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>117373</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2013-06-08 13:20:44 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>REGRESSION: ASSERT failures in stack walking code on FTL branch</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2013-06-08 13:40:15 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>JavaScriptCore</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>Unspecified</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Unspecified</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>InRadar</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</assigned_to>
          <cc>fpizlo</cc>
    
    <cc>ggaren</cc>
    
    <cc>mhahnenberg</cc>
    
    <cc>msaboff</cc>
    
    <cc>oliver</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>898401</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</who>
    <bug_when>2013-06-08 13:20:44 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>The first assertion, in CallFrame::setLocationAsBytecodeOffset(), wrongly assumes that the incoming offset argument is in units of bytes. This is not true. It is in units of Instruction*. Hence, the assertion which checks for the low 2 bits to be clear can fail.  The fix is to remove the assertion.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>898402</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
      <attachid>204095</attachid>
    <who name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</who>
    <bug_when>2013-06-08 13:23:42 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 204095
the patch.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>898403</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
      <attachid>204095</attachid>
    <who name="Oliver Hunt">oliver</who>
    <bug_when>2013-06-08 13:27:50 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 204095
the patch.

Can we have an enum type so distinguish whether an offset should be bytes or instructions?

e.g. enum InstructionOffset {};  enum ByteOffset {}; ByteOffset byteOffsetFromInstruction(unsigned i) { return i * sizeof Instruction } , etc</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>898404</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</who>
    <bug_when>2013-06-08 13:31:15 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>&lt;rdar://problem/14100876&gt;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>898405</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</who>
    <bug_when>2013-06-08 13:37:10 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #2)
&gt; (From update of attachment 204095 [details])
&gt; Can we have an enum type so distinguish whether an offset should be bytes or instructions?
&gt; 
&gt; e.g. enum InstructionOffset {};  enum ByteOffset {}; ByteOffset byteOffsetFromInstruction(unsigned i) { return i * sizeof Instruction } , etc

I&apos;m not sure that will work.  My gut feeling is that it will result in a lot of casting, which would defeat the type safety checks (which is why I think you want the enums, right?).

Thanks for the review.  Patch landed in r151347: &lt;http://trac.webkit.org&gt;.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>898407</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</who>
    <bug_when>2013-06-08 13:40:15 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #4)
&gt; Patch landed in r151347: &lt;http://trac.webkit.org&gt;.

Landed in r151347: &lt;http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/151347&gt;.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>204095</attachid>
            <date>2013-06-08 13:23:42 -0700</date>
            <delta_ts>2013-06-08 13:27:50 -0700</delta_ts>
            <desc>the patch.</desc>
            <filename>bug-117373.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>1478</size>
            <attacher name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">SW5kZXg6IFNvdXJjZS9KYXZhU2NyaXB0Q29yZS9DaGFuZ2VMb2cKPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09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=
</data>
<flag name="review"
          id="225616"
          type_id="1"
          status="+"
          setter="oliver"
    />
          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>