113667 2013-03-31 17:38:50 -0700 Implement SVG2's buffered-rendering property for paths 2013-04-01 15:14:13 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit SVG 528+ (Nightly build) Unspecified Unspecified NEW P2 Normal --- 104207 1 pdr pdr krit syoichi zimmermann oldest_to_newest 866845 0 pdr 2013-03-31 17:38:50 -0700 Paths can benefit more from buffered-rendering than the other shape primitives (e.g., rect). Lets implement it! Spec: https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/single-page.html#painting-BufferedRendering 867325 1 pdr 2013-04-01 13:33:26 -0700 Syoichi, I saw that you cc'ed yourself on this. Are you planning on using this feature? I'd love to get feedback on what users are looking to use it for. 867330 2 krit 2013-04-01 13:38:20 -0700 (In reply to comment #0) > Paths can benefit more from buffered-rendering than the other shape primitives (e.g., rect). Lets implement it! > > Spec: https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/single-page.html#painting-BufferedRendering Lets hold back for a minute and see if we can optimize it in another way before exposing this property widely. What is the main problem on path and how can we fix it without relying on the property. It should be easier than the image problem. 867383 3 pdr 2013-04-01 15:14:13 -0700 (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Paths can benefit more from buffered-rendering than the other shape primitives (e.g., rect). Lets implement it! > > > > Spec: https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/single-page.html#painting-BufferedRendering > > Lets hold back for a minute and see if we can optimize it in another way before exposing this property widely. What is the main problem on path and how can we fix it without relying on the property. It should be easier than the image problem. Consider a complex path such as the animating svg cougar (philbit.com/animatingcougar.svg) or an application that uses very complex paths for text (like Google Docs' presentation tool). In these cases I can see an advantage to not re-rasterizing the path every time. This isn't a fundamental problem with paths, it's just a graphics reality: sometimes it's best to cache the rasterized result. I'm happy to wait on this. Unlike image, I don't know of anyone asking for this feature at the moment.