<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>10690</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-09-02 03:04:17 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>IE Compatibility bugs, explained</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-10-18 01:02:32 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>New Bugs</component>
          <version>420+</version>
          <rep_platform>Mac</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>OS X 10.4</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>INVALID</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.richinstyle.com/bugs/ie5demo.html</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>NeedsReduction</keywords>
          <priority>P4</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Eric Seidel (no email)">eric</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Nobody">webkit-unassigned</assigned_to>
          <cc>ap</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>54627</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Eric Seidel (no email)">eric</who>
    <bug_when>2006-09-02 03:04:17 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;m not sure how helpful this is.  But I ran across this list this evening.

It&apos;s amazing how many of these &quot;bugs&quot; Safari has either chosen to emulated, or just happens to.  What is concerning is that some of them we emulate and firefox does not, or viceversa.  This bug alone is not helpful, but in case someone wishes to go down through this list and file a few specific ones, I thought I should add it to the database anyway.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>54661</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Dave Hyatt">hyatt</who>
    <bug_when>2006-09-02 16:31:28 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>A cursory glance shows that many of these tests are actually wrong, i.e., the author of them is confused.  I think this page is really really old.

</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>