<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>10477</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-08-17 19:53:08 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Unix build failure due to using &quot;String.h&quot; instead of &quot;PlatformString.h&quot;</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-08-18 07:07:33 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>New Bugs</component>
          <version>420+</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>OS X 10.4</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>DUPLICATE</resolution>
          <dup_id>10465</dup_id>
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Krzysztof Kowalczyk">kkowalczyk</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Nobody">webkit-unassigned</assigned_to>
          
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>52889</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Krzysztof Kowalczyk">kkowalczyk</who>
    <bug_when>2006-08-17 19:53:08 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>A recent checkin to DOMParser.cpp does #include &quot;String.h&quot;

I assume it was supposed to be #include &quot;PlatfromString.h&quot; because I can&apos;t see &quot;String.h&quot; anywhere in the sources and no other file (as far as I can tell) uses &quot;Stringh&quot;

Patch attached.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>52890</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
      <attachid>10114</attachid>
    <who name="Krzysztof Kowalczyk">kkowalczyk</who>
    <bug_when>2006-08-17 19:53:49 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 10114
#include &quot;PlatfromString.h&quot; instead of &quot;String.h&quot;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>52891</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Mark Rowe (bdash)">mrowe</who>
    <bug_when>2006-08-17 21:41:23 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Patches generally require ChangeLog entries.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>52894</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Krzysztof Kowalczyk">kkowalczyk</who>
    <bug_when>2006-08-17 22:35:38 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;ll be happy to provide one but I was under the impression that ChangeLog entries are written by actual commiters. That&apos;s how it worked for all the patches I&apos;ve submitted so far.

Does that meant that I also have to provide a diff against ChangeLog or should it be written in the bug?

I&apos;m all for playing by the rules but for trivial patches like this one it seems like an overkill.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>52899</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
      <attachid>10114</attachid>
    <who name="Eric Seidel (no email)">eric</who>
    <bug_when>2006-08-18 02:26:29 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 10114
#include &quot;PlatfromString.h&quot; instead of &quot;String.h&quot;

I believe Wildfox fixed this in another recent patch.  Either could land.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>52921</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)">ddkilzer</who>
    <bug_when>2006-08-18 07:00:35 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #3)
&gt; I&apos;ll be happy to provide one but I was under the impression that ChangeLog
&gt; entries are written by actual commiters. That&apos;s how it worked for all the
&gt; patches I&apos;ve submitted so far.
&gt; 
&gt; Does that meant that I also have to provide a diff against ChangeLog or should
&gt; it be written in the bug?
&gt; 
&gt; I&apos;m all for playing by the rules but for trivial patches like this one it seems
&gt; like an overkill.

ChangeLog entries should be created for all bugs.  Although the web page doesn&apos;t talk about it (yet), the WebKitTools/Scripts/prepare-ChangeLog script will create one for you--you just have to fill in the details.

http://webkit.opendarwin.org/coding/contributing.html
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>52922</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)">ddkilzer</who>
    <bug_when>2006-08-18 07:07:33 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #4)
&gt; (From update of attachment 10114 [edit])
&gt; I believe Wildfox fixed this in another recent patch.  Either could land.

This was fixed in the patch for Bug 10465 by r15932.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 10465 ***</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>10114</attachid>
            <date>2006-08-17 19:53:49 -0700</date>
            <delta_ts>2006-08-18 02:26:29 -0700</delta_ts>
            <desc>#include &quot;PlatfromString.h&quot; instead of &quot;String.h&quot;</desc>
            <filename>string_diff.txt</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>348</size>
            <attacher name="Krzysztof Kowalczyk">kkowalczyk</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">SW5kZXg6IFdlYkNvcmUveG1sL0RPTVBhcnNlci5jcHAKPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09
PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQotLS0gV2ViQ29yZS94
bWwvRE9NUGFyc2VyLmNwcAkocmV2aXNpb24gMTU5MjgpCisrKyBXZWJDb3JlL3htbC9ET01QYXJz
ZXIuY3BwCSh3b3JraW5nIGNvcHkpCkBAIC0yMSw3ICsyMSw3IEBACiAjaW5jbHVkZSAiRE9NUGFy
c2VyLmgiCiAKICNpbmNsdWRlICJET01JbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbi5oIgotI2luY2x1ZGUgIlN0cmlu
Zy5oIgorI2luY2x1ZGUgIlBsYXRmb3JtU3RyaW5nLmgiCiAKIG5hbWVzcGFjZSBXZWJDb3JlIHsK
ICAgICAK
</data>
<flag name="review"
          id="3151"
          type_id="1"
          status="+"
          setter="eric"
    />
          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>