<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>104595</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-12-10 14:21:45 -0800</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>fast/css/empty-generated-content.html needs to be rebaselined after 104462</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2013-03-21 00:34:29 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>Layout and Rendering</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>Unspecified</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Unspecified</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          <dependson>104462</dependson>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Elliott Sprehn">esprehn</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Nobody">webkit-unassigned</assigned_to>
          <cc>pkasting</cc>
    
    <cc>rniwa</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>787714</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Elliott Sprehn">esprehn</who>
    <bug_when>2012-12-10 14:21:45 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>This test used to have an extra anonymous block for some reason I can&apos;t explain. The new generated content implementation seems to fix it.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>859869</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Ryosuke Niwa">rniwa</who>
    <bug_when>2013-03-20 17:05:29 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Committed r146414: &lt;http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/146414&gt;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>860081</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Peter Kasting">pkasting</who>
    <bug_when>2013-03-21 00:03:03 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Rebaselined in r146441.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>860086</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Ryosuke Niwa">rniwa</who>
    <bug_when>2013-03-21 00:08:37 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Don&apos;t we need rebaselines on Qt, GTK+, EFL, etc...?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>860087</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Peter Kasting">pkasting</who>
    <bug_when>2013-03-21 00:13:06 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Bug 104462 only touched the Mac and Chromium TestExpectations files.  The Qt, GTK, and EFL TestExpectations files don&apos;t refer to this test, unless I looked at the wrong files.

Did I miss anything?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>860092</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Ryosuke Niwa">rniwa</who>
    <bug_when>2013-03-21 00:19:02 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #4)
&gt; Bug 104462 only touched the Mac and Chromium TestExpectations files.  The Qt, GTK, and EFL TestExpectations files don&apos;t refer to this test, unless I looked at the wrong files.

I suspect that&apos;s because only Mac and Chromium ports&apos; EWS bots run tests.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>860094</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Elliott Sprehn">esprehn</who>
    <bug_when>2013-03-21 00:20:16 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #5)
&gt; (In reply to comment #4)
&gt; &gt; Bug 104462 only touched the Mac and Chromium TestExpectations files.  The Qt, GTK, and EFL TestExpectations files don&apos;t refer to this test, unless I looked at the wrong files.
&gt; 
&gt; I suspect that&apos;s because only Mac and Chromium ports&apos; EWS bots run tests.

Yup. I asked at the time (which was before the global TestExpectations file existed) and was told to only change ones for the EWS.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>860095</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Ryosuke Niwa">rniwa</who>
    <bug_when>2013-03-21 00:20:42 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>But it does seem like they all have .txt/.png results.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>860097</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Ryosuke Niwa">rniwa</who>
    <bug_when>2013-03-21 00:21:22 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #6)
&gt; (In reply to comment #5)
&gt; &gt; (In reply to comment #4)
&gt; &gt; &gt; Bug 104462 only touched the Mac and Chromium TestExpectations files.  The Qt, GTK, and EFL TestExpectations files don&apos;t refer to this test, unless I looked at the wrong files.
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; I suspect that&apos;s because only Mac and Chromium ports&apos; EWS bots run tests.
&gt; 
&gt; Yup. I asked at the time (which was before the global TestExpectations file existed) and was told to only change ones for the EWS.

That&apos;s just insanely stupid. We&apos;re working around the fact EWS would cq- the patch. We need to improve the tool so that we don&apos;t have to do such a thing.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>860105</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Peter Kasting">pkasting</who>
    <bug_when>2013-03-21 00:33:00 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>I am fine with this being reopened (hopefully with clarity added as to what someone who wants to fix should do).  It&apos;s past midnight here and my brain is getting fuzzy enough that I&apos;m not sure I would write the right thing myself.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>860107</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="Ryosuke Niwa">rniwa</who>
    <bug_when>2013-03-21 00:34:29 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #9)
&gt; I am fine with this being reopened (hopefully with clarity added as to what someone who wants to fix should do).  It&apos;s past midnight here and my brain is getting fuzzy enough that I&apos;m not sure I would write the right thing myself.

Sorry, I think closing the bug is the right thing to do for now. I just had to manually verify that EFL, GTK+, &amp; Qt have respective -expected files, and they indeed do.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>